Agentic AI
From LLM applications to reliable agentic systems
Moving from a conversational application to an autonomous workflow requires explicit execution, tool, memory, evaluation and governance layers.
Agentic systems promise to move AI from answering questions toward accomplishing tasks. That shift creates a new engineering problem: the system must be able to act repeatedly and safely in an environment where individual model responses are probabilistic.
Reliability starts with explicit state
A production agent should have a durable execution identity and a traceable lifecycle. Runs, steps and tool calls should be independently observable so that failures can be diagnosed rather than hidden inside a single response.
Tools need contracts
Tool execution should not depend on unrestricted model-generated function calls. Tools need schemas, authorization, validation, timeouts, idempotency and audit information.
A tool bus or interoperability layer can provide a consistent contract between agents and enterprise capabilities.
Memory is not one thing
Short-term context, retrieved knowledge, user preferences, workflow state and durable organizational knowledge have different lifecycles and security requirements.
Treating all of them as a single memory store makes both governance and debugging harder.
Evaluation must follow execution
Agent quality cannot be measured only by whether a final response looks plausible. Evaluation should consider retrieval evidence, tool outcomes, policy compliance, latency, cost and task completion.
This makes evaluation part of the operating lifecycle rather than a one-time development exercise.
Autonomy requires boundaries
The more autonomous an agent becomes, the more important explicit boundaries become. Identity, permissions, budgets, approved tools and escalation paths provide the control surface required for responsible automation.
Explore Deldai